Skip to main content

Burnout. Job Seekers are Mentally Exhausted

Nick Lichtenberg, writing for Fortune says, “The American worker is too mentally drained to even look for a new job. They are burned out and going nowhere.”  

He goes on to say, “More than half of U.S. workers – 53%, according to a new Glassdoor poll of over 1,300 professionals – say they have paused their job search entirely to protect their mental health. It’s a figure that captures something economists rarely quantify: the exhaustion tax. The psychic cost of a labor market that demands constant hustle while delivering, for many, almost nothing in return.”

For years, career professionals have encouraged workers to “always be networking,” “keep your resume current,” and “never stop looking for your next opportunity.” Those principles still make sense, but today’s job market has created a troubling new reality. Many workers aren’t failing to conduct a job search because they lack ambition or skill. They’re simply exhausted and mentally stressed out.

Career coaches, resume writers, recruiters, and outplacement consultants are increasingly encountering clients and customers who know they need a change, yet can’t summon the emotional energy to pursue one. They delay updating their resume, avoid LinkedIn, ignore networking invitations, and convince themselves they’ll “start next week.”  And next week often becomes next month. Then next year.

The result is a growing population of talented people who feel trapped, not by lack of opportunity or job search skills, but by burnout.  Actually it’s beyond burnout, when you consider job seekers are also being affected by a myriad of issues including health, politics and the world condition, finances, social media, kids, affordability and cost of living, and so on.  All this in addition to ‘job search.’

Burnout Has Become a Career Barrier

Burnout is no longer just a job seeker wellness issue. It’s a career mobility issue.  If the 2026 Glassdoor survey is close to being accurate, with over 50% of job seekers putting their job search on hold to preserve their mental wellbeing, what does this mean for services being offered by employment professionals?  

While the majority of employment pros continue to focus their marketing efforts on resume, interviewing, and career coaching services in the new AI Chat-GPT environment, very few have studied, become certified (CEMP), or are even interested in addressing the underlying issue of job seeker procrastination, disengagement, and underachievement:  Burnout.  Emotional overload.   

There has been a subtle but sizable shift from just a few years ago, when “The Great Resignation” was characterized by confident employees actively seeking better opportunities.  Today’s workforce feels very different.  Actually, today’s whole world feels very different.  Because it is.

The “Low-Hire, Low-Fire” Economy Changes Everything

The current labor market presents a frustrating conundrum.  Unemployment remains relatively stable, yet hiring has slowed considerably. Economists have described today’s environment as a “low-hire, low-fire” economy.  Companies aren’t conducting mass layoffs, but they also aren’t hiring aggressively. 

And workers seeking other opportunities, as well as job seekers, understand this reality.  They hear and read stories about candidates submitting hundreds of applications without receiving interviews.  Confused and/or seeking advice, when they search for career pros on social media, they are simply overwhelmed by the confusing, conflicting, and often fear-driven content. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, recruiters are being excessively flooded by AI-generated applications, the vast majority are never read.  Knowing this, frustration, panic, and burnout accelerate. 

Especially when it comes to the silent killer.  

Silence

It’s always been around.  Job seekers have always known it exists, with many having experienced it.  But today, it’s an out-of-control epidemic.  The silent treatment.  

Job candidates spend hours tailoring résumés, writing customized cover letters, completing online assessments, and participating in multiple interview rounds… only to hear absolutely nothing afterward (Often referred to as ‘ghosting’).  

Here’s the BIG problem with silence.  With resumes, job candidates don’t know:

  1. If their resumes even made it to the hiring entities.
  2. If their resumes were actually read by hiring entities.
  3. If their resumes were competitive.
  4. If their resumes were not competitive, why not?

In interviewing, silence presents similar damaging questions: Was it me?  Was I even competitive?  Did I say something wrong?  

This alone creates emotions that go far beyond burnout because after enough silence, many job seekers transition from burnout to what psychology calls ‘learned helplessness.’ This is a state where job seekers continuously faces uncontrollable, high-anxiety situations, that they eventually stop trying to seek new opportunities, even when new opportunities for success arise.  Or even when desperation intensifies. Burnout leads to a deeply ingrained belief that one’s actions are entirely futile.

Workers Are Staying in Jobs They No Longer Want

Another consequence of burnout is career immobility.  Employees remain in organizations where they’re disengaged because changing jobs appears even more stressful than staying put.

Ironically, remaining in an unhealthy environment often worsens burnout.  Instead of escaping a toxic workplace, workers adapt to it.  Instead of pursuing advancement opportunities, they give up on them.  Instead of networking, they withdraw.  Instead of living optimally, they settle for less than they deserve.  

This creates a dangerous cycle where career dissatisfaction, and the job search process itself, feeds emotional exhaustion.  Which then, prevents the very actions needed to improve the situation.

The Numbers Paint a Sobering Picture

Recent workplace research reinforces what career professionals are witnessing every day.  Robert Half found that 36% of U.S. professionals report feeling burned out at work, while one-third say they’re more burned out than they were a year earlier. Heavy workloads, lack of recognition, and limited career growth remain the leading contributors.  Not to mention the pain, fear, and/or discomfort associated with the idea of a job search.  

In another survey I came across, conducted by MyPerfectResume, they reported that 63% of workers experience burnout multiple times each week, with many emotionally withdrawing from work while remaining employed.

Slow Down, You Move Too Fast

Most job seekers don’t need super advanced employment strategies. They need permission to go over The 59th Street Bridge, and move more slowly.  Rather than overwhelming clients with extensive branding and marketing strategies, today’s successful career practitioners are breaking the process into simplified and manageable steps:

  • Discuss what personal/external factors might hinder success – and plan around that.
  • Break activities down (like the resume) into simple-to-complete tasks and time lines.
  • Reach out to one networking contact today.
  • Apply selectively instead of indiscriminately.
  • Schedule recovery and ‘fun’ time alongside job-search activities.
  • Discuss other people who could become members of a job search team of advisors.

Ironically, doing less often leads to accomplishing more.   Career coach Emily Worden (a PARWCC CPCC) recently advised job seekers to limit their daily search to focused, structured blocks rather than treating the process as a full-time job. Her approach emphasizes quality applications, networking, and maintaining personal well-being to reduce burnout.  

Career Success Requires Emotional Energy

Career development has always been viewed through the lens of strategy – better resumes, better interviewing, better networking, better branding, and better attitude.  But perhaps the most overlooked career asset today is helping job seekers build better emotional capacity.

Burned-out professionals struggle to write compelling accomplishments because they’re mentally depleted.  They postpone networking because every interaction feels draining.  They avoid interviews because they no longer believe anything will change. This isn’t a skills problem. It’s an energy problem.

The Opportunity for Career Coaches

Paradoxically, this challenging environment creates an important opportunity for career professionals.  Clients increasingly need someone who understands both career strategy and emotional resilience.  Yes, the resume still matters.  LinkedIn optimization still matters.  Interview coaching still matters.

But helping job seekers find ‘space’ in their minds and then in their daily schedules, to defeat burnout and rebuild confidence, may matter even more.  

It’s been my experience that often, the greatest value a coach provides isn’t rewriting a resume or practicing mock interviews.  It’s helping someone believe they’re still worth hiring.

Final Thoughts

For career professionals, recognizing this ‘burnout reality,’ changes how you will serve your clients moving forward. You are no longer helping people navigate just a competitive labor market, you’re helping them navigate emotional exhaustion, repeated rejection, employer silence, and uncertainty about the future.

Tomorrow’s top career practitioners will be those who address both sides of the equation – building stronger job-search strategies, while helping clients preserve the mental energy and control required to avoid burnout.    

Please, Stop Helping Me

Dear reader, you’re clearly a savvy internet user if you’re able to navigate the web well enough to be reading this column. So you’ve probably noticed how you can’t go to a single website today without being prompted to take a survey about your experience or answer questions about the type of content you’d like to see.

It’s become common knowledge that anyone you give your email to will send you solicitations asking for help improving their services or begging you for feedback. I’m a regular user of several business management software platforms, and they’ve all drastically increased the presence of pop-ups to recommend additional services and take my temperature on the tools that I already use.

Everybody is trying to help me by improving my experience. And it’s exhausting. At this point, I spend more time in a day turning off the help balloon in the solicitous platform than I do accomplishing tasks. If I have to access five platforms all day, I can be confident that all five will have “new” information to give me and more than likely several questions to ask.

I get it — a lot of people are trying to improve user experience. Swathes of the job market are dedicated to drip campaigns and collecting feedback from users. And it’s nice to think that we can all give just a little bit of information to improve the tools and services we use every day. 

But it’s not just a little attention. It may be a few simple questions for one provider, sure, but when you’re receiving these prompts from ten, twenty, thirty businesses a day, suddenly the time investment isn’t as insignificant as these companies seem to suppose. When everyone wants just a little, I’m disincentivized to give anyone anything at all. 

Today’s lesson is one in customer experience and marketing. If you are in a decision-making position over how often your organization solicits customers for feedback, be judicious. There is a lot of noise out there, and adding to the din for a frivolous reason isn’t going to earn you any goodwill from your user base.

If you simply must prompt users about an exciting new (or new to them) feature, stick to one singular, simple recommendation. One retailer that I particularly like, whose name rhymes with Mommy Llama, reaches out to me three times one day to alert me to new offerings and query me for comments on an item that I purchased a decade ago.

I know that we all crave data. Feedback and information can go a long way in helping improve your offerings. But it helps to move with a light touch. Here’s a case study for my argument: a business I’ve been working with wanted a cross section understanding of marketing spend. They solicited input from a bunch of divisions, allowing respondents to group their answers into one of a handful of categories.

While this got them a lot of data, they decided that it would be more useful to have more granular information. Six buckets grew to thirty-two. With six they had a crude understanding of where the marketing budget went. With thirty-two, they had absolutely no idea. Perhaps predictably, people didn’t want to spend time dividing down this information into the smallest possible subsections, so they lumped it all into one bucket to make the task go away.

By trying to get more, they gave themselves substantially less. This doesn’t mean you should throw up your hands and lament how you can never collect data, but it’s a sign to be cautious that you aren’t generating the mindless noise that constantly drones throughout the internet. 

You already have a relationship with your customers and clients. Don’t abuse it. Nurture that connection, give more than you get, and be very careful with the mindset that you’re helping your customers when you solicit their opinions.

News from PARWCC!

͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌   ͏ ‌  ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

News from PARWCC!

 

News from PARWCC!

 

News from PARWCC!

 

The Operative Word is Artificial

One of the many advantages of being a PARW/CC member is a real understanding of the strengths and limitations of AI. Most of our clients lack those insights.

You can build an effective brand when you prove your products deliver better results than those produced by AI. 

Let me be very clear: We should never criticize AI or imply its users are less than capable.

What we can do, what we should do, is to show how you are extraordinarily well trained to leverage and build upon AI’s strengths.

We must be very sure about what AI’s limitations are. That’s not because we should criticize the tool or imply would be clients are somehow wrong on relying upon it. 

And that can come from looking at AI’s vulnerabilities. Our brands must lead prospective clients to see the value we offer. 

AI résumés represent mediocrity delivered near instantly on a grand scale. Let me explain. When someone uses AI to build their résumé, it relies on the Large Language Model. It can instantly scan hundreds of thousands of résumés. It learns from what it reads. And it guides the user to follow the path that knowledge has shaped.

People forget more than 95% of the résumés AI scans were not successful. As a result, AI learns and transmits mediocrity. Most users never consider that point. So, an AI draft appeals to the misinformed because they don’t know better and the resulting draft is pretty much uniformed job seekers expect.

AI can produce products that don’t sound like the author. That difference can torpedo interviews. After all, writing makes the author’s thought process visible. Hiring officials can detect the difference quickly.

AI can “hallucinate.” The system has been known to manufacture “facts” to support what it writes. Think of it as automated lying. No matter the source, a lie tars someone who cannot be trusted.

AI can resort to flattery. While that may temporarily build an author’s  confidence it won’t take long before that person becomes discouraged. Their reasoning can sound like this:

“AI has been congratulating me and encouraging me. So, I have been following its advice, but I am making no traction at all. I wonder what I am doing wrong?”

No wonder some AI driven job seekers become increasingly distressed.

AI can spray and the job seeker can pray but get no results. Flooding the market with résumés puts the author in the largest possible field of competitors. And it leaves no time for the due diligence that drives the most successful interviews. 

The bottom line: AI relies upon efficiency at the cost of effectiveness.

Now consider what you, as a careers professional, offer to offset the limitations you just read.

You are a trusted confidant. You always give your clients the best possible answers even if they don’t like them at first. And your answers are supported, not by yesterday’s data that fuels AI but by the latest insights you can find as a PARW/CC member. 

You never waste the clients’ time by concentrating upon the obvious or asking extraneous questions as AI often does.

You integrate every aspect of the job search. The résumé, the LI post, the networking guidance, the interview preparation—all these are developed with the entire, tailored campaign in mind.

Reassure prospects that AI can produce pretty good products. In today’s very competitive world, “pretty good” isn’t good enough. We don’t want any job seeker to struggle through a never-ending “pretty good career.”

AI offers efficiency you can’t match. You offer effectiveness your clients can’t do without.

The Future: AI Career Buddies and Career Strategists

Back in the 1980’s, a small group of people anticipated the future, one that would be very different.  They not only adapted to the future they foresaw, but they also created it: PARWCC.

So again, I’m looking into the future and offering my vision.  Yes, I’m retired.  But if I were starting out today… this is how I would be thinking. 

The End of the “Do-It-Yourself” Job Search

Today, job seekers still “search” for jobs. They browse postings, tweak resumes, network like maniacs, prepare for interviews, and submit resumes.  This has been going on since the late 1930’s when job search became ‘an official thing.’   

But in the coming years, that model will feel as outdated as payphones and encyclopedias.  AI is already acting as a career co-pilot, helping job candidates write resumes, optimize keywords, prepare for interviews, and even auto-apply to jobs.  And that number will jump considerably in the years ahead.  

At the same time, employers have moved even faster.  Recent stats suggest that 80%-87% of companies actively employ AI in hiring.  This creates a new reality:  AI is now negotiating with AI for jobs before a human ever enters the conversation.  

Soon, most people will have a personal AI career buddy that:

  • Tracks their skills and achievements in real time.
  • Updates their ‘living resume’ continuously.
  • Identifies opportunities automatically.
  • Applies (or signals interest) on their behalf.
  • Prepares them for interviews dynamically.

The traditional resume? It won’t disappear, but it will become more of a data output, providing validation for information and materials already gathered.  

Resumes will no longer be the starting point.

The Rise of the “Living Career Profile”

One of the biggest structural changes ahead is the shift from static documents to dynamic identity systems.  Dynamic identity systems are adaptive branding frameworks that use generative algorithms and modular elements to create evolving visual identities (brandyhq.com & Noomo Agency).  

In other words, today, a resume is written after experience happens.  In the near future, a workplace/career profile will be updated ‘as experience happens.’  Not by humans.  But by a personal AI career buddy.  

The AI career buddy will continuously build evolving models including skills, performance metrics, personality, work compatibility, values match, learning/adaptive capabilities, etc.  A living career profile. 

This aligns with the rapid shift toward skills-based hiring, where AI evaluates and ‘predicts’  what someone can do – not just where they’ve worked and what they’ve done.  

Resume pros and career coaches will no longer prepare documents.  The AI career buddy will do that.  Employment pros will customize and strategize what the career buddy presents – shaping career data and organizing strategic stories that connect one’s past work experiences, present skills, and future goals to clearly define one’s ‘professional identity.’  

Why a ‘professional identity?’  Because the future will be about matching not searching.  

Semantic Matching:  The Collapse of Keyword Gaming

Resume writing has revolved around beating Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS).  But even now, that system is breaking down.  AI screening tools are evolving beyond simple keyword matching into semantic matching – “a technique in AI and natural language processing (NLP) that identifies whether two or more elements, such as words, sentences, or documents, have the same meaning, rather than just matched based on identical keywords.” (Galileo).  

Today, candidates are rejected for missing exact phrasing.  Tomorrow, they will be evaluated on capability models, not wording tricks.  This will eliminate a major area of traditional resume writing – like  keyword optimization and formatting.  

Instead, value and hireability will shift to clarity of impact, evidence of skills and, of course, differentiation in a sea of AI-generated lookalikes. 

Direct Matching and the Resume Collapse

AI has made applying to jobs nearly frictionless.  Candidates can now generate resumes instantly, customize applications at scale, and apply to hundreds of roles in minutes.  The result?  Application volume is exploding.  The easier it becomes to apply, the harder it becomes to stand out.

Over the next decade, companies will respond by tightening AI filters, reducing reliance on resumes and applications, and increasing the use of direct matching and sourcing algorithms.  

The future of job search will not be the process of applying.  It will transition to being selected.  Being matched.

The Next Frontier Is Not Better Resumes.  It Will Be Better Matching Strategies

We will transition from job search to talent discovery.  

Emerging AI platforms already map candidate skills to job requirements, infer real time capabilities, predict success probability, and recommend candidates before roles are even posted.  In this model, jobs find people, not the other way around.

This mirrors what’s happening in other industries like Netflix, Spotify, and eHarmony, for example.  They gather all necessary information and data via algorithms, and then provide recommendations – ‘matching probabilities.’   

This will occur in the hiring space.    

For employment professionals, this is a seismic shift.  Your role will change from helping clients ‘get found’ to helping them become undeniably ‘matchable.’

So here’s my contrarian take:  Stop obsessing over résumés and interviewing (I didn’t say ignore), and start asking better questions such as, “What proof exists that a job seeker can do what they claim that ‘matches’ employers criteria for hire – algorithmically.”  

This is important because in today’s job search process, claims are cheap, keywords are everywhere, and everyone “sounds impressive.”  Semantic matching will be based on one’s ‘professional identity’ – ‘in real time’ via one’s AI personal career buddy.

Why Your Role Becomes More Important (Not Less)

As AI becomes more dominant, human guidance will become more valuable, not less.  This is because AI introduces three major problems:

  1. Uniformity – everyone has access to the same tools. Once again, outputs start to look identical.
  2. Over-automation – candidates rely too heavily on AI, losing any strategic and competitive advantage. 
  3. Decision paralysis – with way too many options and constant, often conflicting  recommendations, people struggle to make decisions.

This creates massive opportunities for resume writers and career coaches to transition into career (workplace) strategists.  The future, I believe, belongs to professionals who can restore intent, emotion, differentiation, and a new hiring strategy in an AI-driven world.  And, most importantly… those who master new strategies for creating ‘personal identities’ that result in the best ‘matching probabilities.’

Career Strategists

Those who primarily write resumes, LinkedIn profiles and prepare clients for interviews, are becoming (or, are already) commoditized.  This means they pretty much all look alike to their targeted audiences – online and off.  Just look ‘objectively’ to all the LinkedIn posts by resume writers and career coaches today, and put yourself in the shoes of jobseekers.  Honestly,  they are indistinguishable from one another.  Awards, certifications, same questions and advice, overly busy posts.  It’s simply jobseeker overload!

As a result, job seekers find it easier, more comfortable and certainly financially beneficial (FREE) to turn to ChatGPT and AI tools available to them.  

So, future success of today’s resume writers and career coaches will be dependent on their ability to adapt to, and transform into skilled career strategists (architects).  Because job seekers won’t need help writing.  They’ll need help thinking.  

  • How do I optimize my AI career buddy and lean on my career strategist?  
  • What direction should I pursue and what skills must I build next?  
  • How will my industry evolve, and how do I position myself to be highly relevant.  
  • How do I stay positive when the spaghetti hits the fan?   

Career strategists will build expertise in skills translation.  As hiring becomes skills-based, strategists will help job seekers translate experience into skills, map skills across industries and professions, and identify gaps and fill them.

Career strategists will understand that their advantage is not avoiding AI or competing with it, but rather orchestrating it better than job seekers can do alone, or with traditional professionals.  They will focus on tactical differentiation and significant  narratives (stories hiring pros ‘really’ want).  Personal identities.

When everyone uses AI, sameness becomes the default.  The role of career strategists (architects) will be to tactically extract authentic value, craft compelling narratives, and build professional identities to optimize matching opportunities.

Final Thought

Job seekers will no longer be judged by what they say on résumés.  They’ll be evaluated by what systems can detect, verify, and match about them – not unlike Amazon that matches an array of items for our buying pleasure, based on our Amazon shopping buddy (algorithms based on what Amazon knows about us).  

It’s underway.  The future of job search will be a radical shift (not pivot) to ‘Employment Matching.’  

 

*  “Personal identity” is primarily the process of ‘identity verification’ – proving a job seeker is who they say they are and can validate (in real time) their value proposition. 

 

You Blew It! Again! What Now?

You’ve been here before. You’re out to eat at a restaurant, and you’re split between two choices. Maybe your friend or partner orders one of the options you were considering, so you pick the other. But one bite in and you’re completely sure that the steak was vastly superior to the pasta you’re chewing.

You both had the same information, but looking back on it, you don’t like where your choice led you. This happens all the time — everybody makes choices every day, but for a manager, that is literally the job description. Yet time and again, I see managers who don’t like the outcome of a choice and automatically conclude that there was a flaw in their decision making.

I challenge you to rethink this process. First and foremost, leadership is nothing more and nothing less than the capacity to make a well-reasoned decision using limited information. Without that, an organization is rudderless, unfocused, and missing opportunities while it swats blindly at threats.

Being a leader means gathering as much information as you reasonably can, assessing and evaluating it to land on the best choice, then enacting that decision. Being a leader also means making decisions that don’t turn out well. Life is not a math equation with clearly defined variables — you’re always working off imperfect data, which will, perhaps not infrequently, lead to imperfect choices and imperfect results.

To go back to our example at the restaurant, you could have carefully studied the menu and even taken a look around the room to suss out how the options looked on the plate. Even doing all that, you can still end up with a less-than-stellar dish. That doesn’t make it your fault — the chef could have had an off day, there could be a problem with a certain ingredient, or maybe your plate was just left under a heat lamp for too long.

You can collect all the data that you want, but at some point, you have to pull the trigger and make a decision. When you do, it’s important that you’re comfortable finding out later that you could have chosen better. This doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t look critically at your choices, but it does mean that you’ll be better served by examining your process rather than the outcome.

In these reflections, you may find that you misunderstood information or failed to collect and analyze a crucial data point. If so, then you have learned an important lesson for the future. But if you find that you made the best decision you could with the information available, then there’s nothing for you to change, even if it led to a bad result.

Let me be clear: making the wrong decision is not a problem. How you react and deal with that result is what makes you a leader. True leaders can look back on their decisions and objectively evaluate the process that led to their choice. Bad leaders get caught up in the “what ifs” and struggle to make any decision going forward.

Being wrong is just a byproduct of routinely making decisions and keeping your organization forward. That’s why it’s important to create a culture of reviewing decisions, not outcomes. Challenging your decision process is healthy and a sign of a growing organization. But if you question everything, especially due to a bad result, then you’ll quickly find yourself paralyzed and unable to make necessary choices.

Through the macro lens, the role of leadership is fairly simple. Just do your homework and make the best decision that you can. The outcome may not be what you wanted, but that isn’t always within your control. So be a leader and center your attention on what is firmly within your grasp: the process.

Helping Clients Navigate a Market that Looks Better than It Feels

If you’ve worked with job seekers recently, you’ve likely heard a version of the same frustration:

“I’ve applied to hundreds of jobs and heard nothing back.”

“The unemployment rate is low, so why can’t I find a job?”

“Everyone says companies are hiring, but it doesn’t feel that way.”

The latest labor market data tells a generally positive story. In May 2026, employers added 172,000 jobs, nearly double what economists expected. The unemployment rate remains relatively low at 4.3%, and the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) reported 7.6 million open positions, the highest level seen in nearly two years.

By many traditional measures, the labor market appears healthy.

Yet many job seekers are experiencing something entirely different.

This disconnect between the economic data and the lived experience of job seekers is creating confusion, frustration, and self-doubt. As career coaches and résumé writers, understanding this gap is critical—not only for helping clients navigate the market, but also for helping them maintain confidence throughout the process.

The Data Says the Market Is Improving

Recent labor market reports show continued job growth and an increase in job openings. Private employers added another 122,000 jobs in May, with eight of ten major industry sectors reporting gains. Healthcare, professional services, construction, hospitality, and government continue to show hiring activity.

Layoffs also remain relatively low compared to historical averages. Unlike previous economic downturns, most organizations are not aggressively reducing headcount.

At first glance, these numbers suggest a strong and stable employment environment.

For many professionals, however, the reality feels far more challenging.

Why Job Seekers Feel Stuck

The answer lies in what the headline numbers don’t reveal.

While companies are hiring, many are doing so more cautiously than in previous years. Organizations have become increasingly selective, often seeking candidates who can demonstrate immediate impact rather than potential.

Hiring processes are also taking longer. Roles may remain open for months while employers evaluate candidates, adjust budgets, or reconsider organizational priorities. What once took four weeks can now take three or four months.

The labor market has become what economists are calling a “low-hire, low-fire” environment. Employers are holding onto talent, but they are not replacing positions as quickly as they did during the post-pandemic hiring surge.

As a result, job seekers are spending more time in the market. The median duration of unemployment has risen to 11.6 weeks, the highest level since 2021. Even more concerning, more than 27% of unemployed workers have been searching for work for 27 weeks or longer.

Candidates are not necessarily being rejected more frequently; they are simply spending more time in the process.

For job seekers, that distinction often doesn’t matter. The emotional experience is the same: uncertainty, discouragement, and the feeling that something must be wrong with them.

The Rise of Selective Hiring

One of the most significant trends career professionals should be watching is the shift toward selective hiring.

Many organizations learned difficult lessons during the rapid hiring cycles of 2021 and 2022. Today, employers are scrutinizing hiring decisions more carefully, often requiring additional interviews, broader stakeholder input, and stronger evidence of performance.

This means job seekers can no longer rely solely on meeting the minimum qualifications.

Candidates who clearly communicate measurable results, leadership impact, and business value continue to separate themselves from the competition.

For résumé writers, this reinforces the importance of moving beyond task-focused content and emphasizing outcomes, achievements, and strategic contributions.

For coaches, it creates an opportunity to help clients articulate their value with greater clarity and confidence.

The Hidden Job Market Is Still Alive

Another reality that many job seekers underestimate is the continued importance of networking.

Despite the growth of online applications and AI-powered recruiting tools, many positions—particularly at the management, director, and executive levels—are still filled through relationships, referrals, and professional networks.

The strongest candidates are often not those who submit the most applications. They are the individuals who build visibility, engage their network, and create opportunities through conversations.

This is where career professionals continue to provide tremendous value.

Helping clients shift from an application-focused strategy to a relationship-focused strategy can dramatically improve outcomes, particularly for experienced professionals.

Confidence Is Becoming a Competitive Advantage

Perhaps the most overlooked challenge in today’s labor market is not a résumé problem or a networking problem. It’s a confidence problem.

Longer job searches naturally create self-doubt. Candidates begin questioning their experience, their qualifications, and even their career direction.

When every application feels like a dead end, it becomes difficult to maintain momentum.

As career professionals, we are often doing far more than optimizing résumés or preparing clients for interviews. We are helping people maintain perspective during one of the most emotionally challenging periods of their professional lives.

The ability to reframe setbacks, reinforce strengths, and keep clients moving forward may be one of the most valuable services we provide.

What This Means for Career Professionals

The labor market is not as weak as many job seekers believe, but it is also not as simple as the headline numbers suggest.

Our role is to help clients understand both realities simultaneously.

Yes, opportunities exist. There are 7.6 million job openings in the United States.

Yes, employers are hiring. The economy added 172,000 jobs in May alone.

But hiring is slower. Competition remains strong. Employers are more selective. And successful job searches require more strategy than ever before.

The good news is that these conditions create meaningful opportunities for career coaches, résumé writers, and career development professionals to make a lasting impact.

The clients who succeed in this market are rarely the ones who apply the most. They are the ones who understand their value, communicate it effectively, build strategic relationships, and stay persistent when the process takes longer than expected.

Helping clients develop those skills may be the most important work we do in 2026.

Setting the Standard: Meet the Inaugural PARWCC Elite Circle Coaching Award Winners

This year marks the inaugural recognition of  exceptional professionals who embody the highest standards of career coaching excellence through the PARWCC Career Coach of the Year Awards. These distinguished honors celebrate coaches who have demonstrated outstanding commitment to client success, innovation in career development, and meaningful contributions to the career services profession. Through their expertise, dedication, and leadership, these individuals have made a lasting impact on the lives and careers of those they serve.  Please join me in welcoming the inaugural PARWCC Elite Circle Career Coaching Award Winners:

Elite Circle Awards

 

The Role of Professional Distance in Resume Writing

A strong legal argument and a strong résumé both rely heavily on the ability to project believable claims that don’t sound exaggerated, defensive, evasive, inflated, or emotionally loaded. Neither profession merely “records facts”; rather, the interpretation of those facts makes all the difference.

Lawyers and résumé writers understand that people rarely describe themselves objectively under pressure. Witnesses ramble. Executives inflate. Laid-off employees overexplain. Founders cling to identity. Most professionals narrate emotionally. The résumé writer’s job is to recognize when that emotional lens is distorting the story.

The advanced work in both professions is judgment, not writing.

Sure, we edit words. But a résumé writer and an attorney both transform emotionally entangled experience into clear, credible, and strategically useful communication. The good ones know how and when to apply the calibrated perspective of professional distance.

Emotional overattachment rarely announces itself directly. More often, it appears in subtle patterns of language. Here are five common signals:

 

Defensive Tone

    • Example 1: Successfully maintained departmental operations despite chronic understaffing, budget constraints, unrealistic expectations, and constant organizational restructuring.
  • Diagnosis: The résumé starts sounding like testimony instead of positioning, like the candidate is still emotionally arguing with the former employer.
  • Better: Maintained departmental operations during periods of restructuring and staffing shortages.

 

Identity Clinging

    • Example 2: Dedicated educator with a lifelong passion for shaping young minds and making a meaningful difference in every student’s life.
    • Diagnosis: Identity language overwhelms positioning.
  • Better: Educator experienced in curriculum development, student engagement, and classroom leadership.

 

Over-explaining

    • Example 3: Position eliminated after company-wide restructuring unrelated to performance following leadership changes and regional downsizing initiatives.
  • Diagnosis: Excess explanation reveals anxiety.
  • Better: Position eliminated during organizational restructuring.

 

Inflated Self-Protection

  • Example 4: Visionary transformational leader recognized for unparalleled dedication, exceptional interpersonal excellence, and unwavering commitment to organizational success.
  • Diagnosis: Inflated language masks insecurity.
  • Better: Operations leader experienced in organizational transformation, team development, and process improvement.

 

Emotional Narration

  • Example 5: Worked tirelessly to support vulnerable populations during one of the most difficult periods in modern healthcare history.
  • Diagnosis: Emotional narration can overpower or reduce clarity.
  • Better: Supported high-volume patient populations during peak pandemic operations.

 

The goal is not emotional detachment from the client. It is professional distance from the client’s interpretation of events. The résumé writer’s role is to transform lived experience into credible positioning. That requires empathy, but also enough distance to see the story clearly.

NEXT MONTH: What happens if your résumé writing is too emotionally detached?