News from PARWCC!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As usual – I was on the phone with one of my dearest friends. She works for a well known not-for-profit organization and one of her responsibilities is hiring.
“Why is it so hard to hire someone?” This was a rhetorical question. “It’s TikTok. TikTok has made people stupid.”
I laughed because she meant it as a joke – we have had many, many (so many) conversations about the challenges of contemporary hiring and we both know how complicated hiring has become.
But then I was on social media later that day and indeed there were dozens of posts from people who had either been laid off or had been job searching and expressing their frustrations and fears because it can be hard and scary.
Then . . . and I knew I shouldn’t . . . I went to the comment section. The people in the comments who were suddenly “coaches” giving the advice that varied from meh to really terrible far outweighed the people just expressing sympathy.
You have to assume that candidates aren’t taking every bit of advice in their comment section but at a time when the average job search is taking double digit months, even taking some bad advice could lead someone to be less prepared and less able to make solid decisions going forward in their job search.
Overall, I think social media is pretty great. I’ve learned a lot of things thanks to social media! I’ve kept in touch with friends and family so easily that I think the connectivity is one of the best things about social platforms. And I sometimes find it entertaining.
But like everything there are downsides.
We are seeing resumes stuffed with job description key words because a social media post promised “beating the ATS/AI.” We are seeing candidates mass-applying to hundreds of jobs with AI-generated materials that might sound good, even if they don’t represent them at all. We are seeing people convinced that every employer is trying to trick them, every interview question is a psychological trap, and every rejection is evidence of corporate greed.
Even worse, social media has likely contributed to the short attention spans around the entire job search process. Many candidates now expect instant results from minimal effort. They want a resume written in 10 minutes, interview preparation from a chatbot, and a six-figure remote role after clicking “Easy Apply” fifty times from the couch. On social media it’s become a little bit of a “flex” to say something like, “I’ve applied to five hundred jobs and I haven’t even had one interview!”
The job market is chaotic enough without adding armchair experts to the mix. Undoing misinformation with clients becomes a regular part of onboarding and clients meetings. Setting realistic expectations with job seekers can feel discouraging when social media experts claim they were hired in two weeks. Explaining why networking still matters, and reminding candidates that authenticity is more effective than whatever “hack” is trending this week has become a frustrating barrier to getting clients hired.
Social media can be a tool. But when job seekers allow it to replace authenticity and human connection, it stops being helpful and starts getting in the way.
I am a bit fuzzy about the most important project I ever worked in my previous career—except it shapes the way I run my business. I remember the project directly affected national security, was classified above Top Secret, and would be read by people whose names I saw regularly on the front page of the Washington Post. I’ll tell you what I learned because I hope it will help you run your practice and manage your life a little better.
Just like that first email from your last client, my project came at a very busy time. And, just like your last client, the general officer who asked my help had a large personal stake in the outcome. And perhaps like your last client, I had never done precisely this kind of project before. And perhaps just like you, I signed up enthusiastically and agreed to a deadline I should have thought about twice.
When it was all done, my mentor took me aside. “Next time,” he said, “try using this.” He handed me his business card. Puzzled, I just stared at him. “Turn it over,” he said.
There, on the back of the card, was a single column of three boxes. This is what it looked like:
❑ Good
❑ Cheap
❑ Fast
Pick any two!
For a moment, I didn’t get it. Then it became very clear: If you want it good and fast, it won’t be cheap; if you want it cheap and fast, it won’t be good. You get the idea. Now I want you and your clients to get the idea too by adapting the model that has served me so well.
If I had the same thing on the back of my business card, I would print it with the word “Good” already checked. And I would say: “Check any one of the remaining two boxes.” Good is not negotiable.
I know you’re tempted sometimes to take on a project you know you shouldn’t, but you need a little extra money. That extra money costs way too much. The résumé you write may have your client’s name at the top, but it is your résumé. It will always help define your brand. Because your work is excellent, those in the know will want to hire you.
But if you charge low rates you’re not making enough to grow your business. Because your prices are low, those who do not know you may go elsewhere; they think they get what they pay for. Those who have little to offer will seek you out, but you can’t do much to help them. And so, they may blame you for their failures.
Consider the résumé writer (usually not a member of a professional organization like PARWCC) who churns out “cookie cutter” résumés at very low cost. He charges less because his labor is less.
But his brand is defined for him—by his clients (whose “cookie cutter” résumés keep them from the best jobs) and by perspective employers (who recognize hackneyed writing when they see it). His brand is: cheap. He is the Spirit Airlines of résumé writers.
It only gets worse. Others in our industry would never refer a client to him. Because he has no new ideas, he never contributes to the literature, you never see him at professional conferences. If his work didn’t reflect so poorly on our industry, he would be irrelevant. That is why greatness in what you do is never negotiable.
While “cheap” isn’t something we want to be associated with either, it does remind us about levels of investment we set and the value we deliver. There are two important ideas referenced in that previous sentence.
First, I never refer to “price.” I like neither the denotation nor the connotation. Webster’s definition: “…that which must be done, sacrificed, suffered, etc. in return for something …a price on someone’s head…to have one’s price, to be willing to be bribed if the bribe is big enough.”
Invest, on the other hand, is much closer to the mark: “to expect a yield, profit or income.” Even the secondary meaning is positive, “to confer an office or rank upon.” In short, I expect my clients to make or save more money than it costs to engage me. That’s a grand thing for me to believe. But it counts for nothing if my clients don’t believe it.
We want our clients to see return on their investment. The greater the investment, the greater the likelihood of a big return. Where does “cheap” fit in? It reminds us to tailor the services we offer to the level of investment our clients can make. And we’re talking about more than money.
Consider two clients. Both are senior. Both have great track records. Both need about the same services. One is very busily employed; the other is between jobs. Should the levels of investment—can the levels of investment—be the same?
My unemployed client can make a much greater investment in time. That means I have to do less work. His level of investment is appropriately lower. On the other hand, my working client’s days are not her own. I must do more of the work. Her investment is correspondingly higher. The same reasoning is behind the services we offer.
People pay me more when I prepare Federal applications. Why? Because Federal applications are arduous. Time is money.
Even when there are no forms, the difficulty of the task raises the amount I charge. Those who have written Senior Executive Service applications know exactly what I mean. The writing standards are very high indeed. Quality costs money.
Time is money in another way as well. That’s where “fast” comes in. You can usually spot potential clients who want to know, right up front, how much you charge for a résumé. What they probably want is your price for doing a résumé overnight or over the weekend.
If they could see the back of your “improved” business card, the only word that would blare out at them is “FAST.” If you agree to this arrangement, you both paid too high a price.
Naturally, you charged the client more for night or weekend work. And you incurred the cost of time away from your family and the extra fatigue that comes from working two weeks straight. We avoid such waste by remembering the first standard: “Good.”
Good defeats most arbitrarily imposed deadlines. Your client may think he needs a résumé right now, but what he really wants is a job. Guide him to see the difference in terms that serve you, your client and his next boss. Let’s listen in:
Caller: “How much do you charge for a résumé? I need mine updated right away.”
Coach: “Are you trying to meet a very tight deadline? I ask because I like my clients to help set the level of investment so they get top value.”
Caller: “Yes, they said they needed a résumé by tomorrow morning.”
Coach: “I can see the pressure they’ve put you under. Let’s see how we can help them and still get the best value for you. People who want your résumé need your help to fill a job right away. Someone thinks you are a good candidate. He’s putting his credibility on the line when he forwards your résumé. Does that make sense?”
Caller: “I think so. But if I don’t get the résumé to them by COB tomorrow, I may not get the job.”
Coach: “So let’s offer that person an alternative. Tell him you understand his problem. And your first thought was to give him the résumé you have now. But you want him to get the credit for helping hire the right person. So, if he can trade a little time for a lot of quality, wouldn’t he prefer a document tailored right to his company’s needs?
Rather than being dismissed at not meeting some arbitrary deadline, I think you’ll be seen as ready to do something extra to meet the company’s needs. There are very few jobs indeed that can’t go unfilled for a few days.”
I have lost a few sales with that approach. What if the caller persists in his unreasonable deadline? You could update his résumé, but you need information from him after normal business hours today. Of course, you want to be sure your client has time to review the draft. Since the company wants the résumé in the morning, that means the client must come in before normal business hours tomorrow to complete the review. It’s going to be a long night for him.
However, it will be an even longer night for you. You must give your undivided attention to this project. Specifically, you may work until midnight, and then come in early. All these things you are happy to do, but there is an express charge.
How much should the express charge be? Large enough to meet your needs. I hate working weekends or through the night. So I kept doubling the express charge until I knew no one could afford it. Today, a client would have to pay me an additional $4,000 to work under those conditions.
The reason I know that is a ridiculous amount is simple: I haven’t worked through the night or over a weekend in more than five years! And if I ever get a client who will pay $500 above the normal investment, I will do two things. First, I will admit my plan failed. Second, I will raise the express charge to $1,000!
It is up to us to maximize our efficiency. Simply put, we must write truly exceptional job search documents quickly. We can speed up our writing in several ways.
Put Word to work. It’s amazing how much time you save when you exploit automated templates, AutoText and AutoCorrect, high speed desktop search engines, unattended backups and security scans. If any of those terms are new to you, pick just one and master it.
Each time you use a software trick, you save only a few seconds. Each time you use several software tricks, you are saving a minute or more. How many documents do you produce in a year? If your answer is around 160, then you will save 240 minutes each year. That’s six work weeks!
Put your self-discipline to work. Because time management fills many books, I won’t dwell on it. But I offer this suggestion: treat yourself as you would your best client. When you commit to writing a résumé, commit to scheduling yourself uninterrupted time to complete the task. You’ll be amazed at what a lack of distractions can do for you. Promising yourself time to write the documents means you can promise your client a fixed review date, something that gives her peace of mind.
Put your professional development to work. You’re already doing some of that now as you read this issue of The Spotlight. But I’m going to suggest a better approach. Decide which skills you need to master, then pick just one and follow through.
Do you want to expand your coaching skills, then consider the CPCC coaching program like the one offered by Diane Hudson. Do you need to sharpen how you help clients negotiate for salary, benefits, perks, and severance?
My mentor from long ago with his magic business card had something new. He introduced me to the difference between value and features.
Our brand is a promise of value, not a collection of features. That value rests on greatness. What remains is how quickly and at what level of investment we deliver greatness. When we do that with our clients well, they win…and so do we and our families.
Put five résumé writers in a room, and I’ll show you five different versions of the truth.
Put five résumé writers and a decision-maker in a room, and I’ll show you one version of the truth.
Five plus one equals one.
That’s résumé writer math.
In a world where denominators are neither low nor common, résumé writer math cuts to the core.
Who will read the finite words I write, weigh them against the infinite ones I don’t, and somehow reach the conclusion I wanted them to reach in the first place?
The known plus the unknowable equals connection.
That’s the résumé writer’s prayer.
Give a client a blank page, and they will fill it with everything they’ve ever done.
Give a hiring manager a full page, and they will only see what they’re looking for.
When abundance meets attention, one must shrink so the other can expand.
Less plus intent equals impact.
That’s résumé writer economy.
Every résumé begins as a biography.
Every job description ends as a filter.
The space between them is a negotiation.
What is kept must serve; what is removed must disappear without complaint.
Memory minus ego equals clarity.
That’s résumé writer targeting.
A candidate wants to be understood.
A recruiter wants to decide.
Understanding takes time; decisions take seconds.
So we compress years into moments, complexity into signal, history into a heartbeat.
Experience divided by calculated risk equals lightning in a bottle.
That’s résumé writer alchemy.
Years compete for inches.
Inches compete for seconds.
Seconds compete for decisions.
Destiny is in the little things.
The federal government workforce experienced an unprecedented shake-up in 2025, with mass layoffs under the Voluntary Early Retirement Authority (VERA), Deferred Resignation Offer, and other options. Moreover, the application process was transformed from a long, résumé-and-questions application to a short, industry-style two-page résumé and skills-based hiring process.
USA Today reported in December 2025 that more than 317,000 federal employees left the government in 2025 (from a workforce of about 2.4 million). Most employees took voluntary buyouts and early retirements.
Now that the dust is settling and agencies are finalizing budgets and workforce needs, some are hiring again for specific positions.
Historically, the federal government used lengthy résumés, Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs) essays, or narrative statements. Résumés in the past 10 years were an average of five pages. The résumés were detailed and included full addresses for employers, full dates of employment, supervisor’s names and contact information, long lists of training, awards, and education, as well as duties and accomplishments.
Applicants also completed self-assessment questionnaires ranging from 5 to 10 questions to 175.
The new application process includes a maximum two-page résumé, four optional mini-narrative responses (up to 200 words), and, in some cases, a several-hour skills-based assessment. Some agencies have their own application processes.
The new mini essays must be written personally, without the use of AI. If the applicant is found to have used AI, they may be disqualified from the application process. The questions include:
As of April 2026, a keyword search for various job titles, agencies, and hiring authorities revealed the following:
Manager: 5400 open positions
Nurse: 1180
Director: 1418
Information Technology: 4935
Doctor: 1221
Engineer: 700
Electrician: 78
Accountant: 84
Direct Hire: 1852 (A direct hire authority means an agency has an immediate need to fill a specific position. It allows agencies to hire candidates without the usual competitive process, and it is often used to fill critical positions quickly, especially in high-demand fields.)
GS-15: 866 (Highest GS level – one level below SES (see below))
Veterinarian: 49
IRS: 78 positions
NASA: 45
ICE: 201 positions
Homeland Security: 581
Overseas jobs: 467
Jobs in Alaska: 170
Agencies hiring include the FAA, TSA, DHS, Navy Sea Command, Department of Justice, Social Security Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Veterans Health Administration, Smithsonian, Architect of the Capitol, and many more.
This is good news for career coaches interested in coaching federal applicants through the federal application process.
Each applicant will require a two-page, well-focused résumé targeted to the duties, KSAs, qualifications, and competencies for a specific position; development of the four mini essays; navigation through qualification questionnaires or skills-based assessments; and potential structured interviews.
The Senior Executive Service (SES) is a federal leadership system in the U.S. government consisting of a cadre of about 7,000 high-level officials who manage the day-to-day operations of federal agencies. They are appointed based on their qualifications, experience, and their meeting of leadership executive core qualification competencies, not through the competitive civil service process.
SES members are certified through the Office of Personnel Management to receive their appointment.
For many years, SES applicants were required to submit a five-page résumé, 10 pages of leadership essays (10 essays at 1 page each), and, in many applications, additional essays to demonstrate Technical Qualifications. Some applications were 21+ pages. The application portfolio with résumé and essays was then reviewed and certified by OPM after the candidate was offered the SES position.
In 2025, the application process was changed to a maximum of two pages for the résumé and completion of an Executive Core Qualification (ECQ) interview with the hiring agency and the OPM Qualifications Review Board (QRB).
These Senior Executive Service applicants now require career coaching to develop very specific, tight, executive-level two-page résumés focused on the Executive Core Qualifications and the Technical Qualifications specified in the target job announcement, and to prepare for structured interviews focused on the Executive Core Qualifications.
The new Executive Core Qualifications and sub-competencies include:
If you coach executives, you might appreciate coaching SES applicants through this executive-level application process.
If you write résumés and provide interview coaching, working with federal applicants is like coaching industry applicants.
An application process that was once daunting, lengthy, and seemingly challenging for many career coaches is now within reach, as it is similar to the industry application process.
As the federal government ramps up hiring in the coming months and years, we can certainly deliver superior career coaching services to our federal clients.
I wince any time I see an online career services influencer declare definitively that their way to frame an interview answer is THE way. Our clients are not homogeneous, their target industries are all different, and everyone has a unique voice and learning style. Our job is to match our clients with the right tool.
When I started teaching interview skills ten years ago, I taught all my clients to use the STAR (Situation – Task – Action – Result) model when telling success stories. The STAR framework has been the most widely taught interview narrative technique since it was developed in 1974 by industrial organizational psychologists William C. Byham and Douglas Bray. And for many candidates, it works. It gives structure, keeps answers organized, and helps clients avoid rambling.
But I soon noticed that a few of my clients found the concept of “Situation” too ambiguous. So I changed my framework to CAR (Challenge – Action – Result), which seemed to clarify it for some. Then I added an “O” for Obstacles because I saw that clients were getting lost in too much detail in the beginning of their story. For some clients, COAR became STOAR, while others still needed the simplicity of CAR.
Every interview coach has their favorite iteration of STAR: PAR, CART, CARL, RSTAR, etc. Which is the best narrative framework for a success story in an interview? That depends on the industry, the role, the interviewer, and where the candidate is in the interview process. None of the STAR-derivatives may be the best choice for our senior level clients. None of the STAR doppelgangers are a perfect narrative vehicle for jobseekers in tech.
To best serve our clients, we need to build and use a whole toolbox of narrative structures.
Here’s the limitation with STAR: When we teach the “Actions” in STAR, we encourage clients to “say what you did”, highlighting the specific actions they executed to create the result. Demonstrating successful execution is important for most career roles, especially in the beginning of the hiring assessment when the primary question is whether someone has the competencies to do the job.
But at the senior executive level, particularly in the final rounds, that question has already been asked and answered. Every candidate left standing by then is qualified to get the job done. Final round executive candidates are often evaluated on their judgment: how they think, how they make decisions, and whether their judgment can be trusted in complex, high-stakes situations. Strong executive candidates must make their thinking visible. If they just talk about what they executed instead of what they decided, they risk sounding like a manager instead of a leader. Managers execute strategy. Leaders set strategy.
This is where STAR-based frameworks start to break down. For a senior executive in a final round interview, STAR does not promote the articulation of decision-making and judgment. With its emphasis on “Action”, STAR stories focus on the “what” instead of on the “why”.
So – what framework might be more effective at senior levels to demonstrate judgment? Again, that depends on the client, the role, and your style as a coach. Success stories that highlight judgment and decision-making will answer these questions:
And if you must have a pithy acronym, you might try DRIVE: Define – Risks – Insights – Verdict – Effect.
“Tell me about yourself” is another framework that could use alternatives that reflect what different industries truly value. The commonly-used framework of PRESENT (what I’m doing now) – PAST (what I’ve done before) – FUTURE (what I would bring to the role and/or why this is the right next step for my career) is functional. It serves well enough in most instances, but it doesn’t help our clients make a strong, memorable entrance at the top of the conversation. That structure may not promote the highlights that matter to that interviewer. What does? Once more, that depends on the industry, the interviewer, your client, and your willingness as a coach to think creatively. There is only one nonnegotiable with a “tell me about yourself” answer: it must address how the candidate’s professional background relates to the role.
Let’s use senior executives again as an example. For their “tell me about yourself” answer, I want my executive clients to highlight the signature problems they solve for a company, the initiatives that they own end-to-end, the strategic decisions they’ve made, and the impact of those decisions. I want their introduction to say very clearly what they offer as a leader and what they can do for the company. A PRESENT-PAST-FUTURE framework is just not specific or targeted enough as a guide.
I challenged January’s CIC live cohort to design their own “tell me about yourself” narrative framework to use with their clients. Their creativity was truly inspiring. The variety of structures and styles they developed was reflective of the variety of industries and clients they coach. An introduction during a technical interview requires a framework that highlights problem-solving and depth of expertise. A new grad’s story may lean more heavily on potential, learning mindset, and translating academic and early experiences into clear value for the employer.
Different roles require different narrative emphasis. And different stories need to be told differently in different interview contexts. When we default to one structure for every client and every role, we limit our client’s ability to communicate effectively in that interview for that role. The narrative structure we teach should serve the specific role-aligned signals our client needs to communicate to a particular interviewer at a given stage of the interview process.
Defaulting to one narrative framework limits our coaching. Our role is not to give clients one “right” way to tell a story. Our job is to equip our clients with the best structure for the signals they need to communicate in each unique interview.
I still teach STAR. I probably always will. It’s earned its place in our profession for good reason. But after coaching enough clients across enough industries, I’ve become a little suspicious of any framework I’m tempted to use too automatically. The moment a framework becomes my default instead of my deliberate choice, it’s usually a sign that I’m leaning on habit instead of judgment. And judgment – not acronyms – is what great coaching is built on.
The April 2026 job market report tells a more nuanced story than many headlines suggest.
Yes, hiring continues. The labor market has not collapsed. Unemployment remains relatively low, and industries like healthcare, transportation, and social assistance are still growing steadily. But underneath those numbers is a shift many career coaches and résumé writers are already seeing firsthand with clients every day:
The market has become far more selective.
Job seekers are applying to more positions and hearing back less often. Hiring timelines are longer. Employers are moving cautiously. Remote opportunities continue attracting overwhelming competition. And perhaps most importantly, companies are placing a growing emphasis on adaptability, strategic thinking, and measurable business impact.
For career professionals, this matters because many clients are entering the job search assuming the rules are the same as they were even two years ago. They are not.
One of the biggest shifts in today’s market is the declining effectiveness of mass online applications, particularly for white-collar and remote roles.
Many professionals are submitting dozens — sometimes hundreds — of applications with little traction. While that can feel discouraging, it does not necessarily indicate a lack of qualifications. More often, it reflects increased competition and employer caution.
Companies are hiring more carefully. Teams are leaner. Budgets are tighter. Hiring managers want candidates who can demonstrate immediate value.
That means generic résumés and passive LinkedIn profiles are struggling to compete.
Career coaches and résumé writers now play an even more strategic role in helping clients:
The clients who stand out are rarely the ones applying the fastest. They are the ones communicating value the clearest.
Artificial intelligence continues to reshape hiring conversations across industries.
While there is understandable concern around AI replacing certain tasks, the more immediate shift is that employers are increasingly prioritizing professionals who can adapt alongside evolving technology.
This is especially relevant for:
At the same time, employers are placing greater value on skills AI cannot easily replicate:
This creates an important coaching opportunity.
Many job seekers still focus primarily on listing responsibilities rather than communicating business impact and human-centered value. Coaches and résumé writers can help bridge that gap by teaching clients how to position themselves beyond task execution.
The conversation is no longer just: “What did you do?”
It is increasingly: “How did you improve outcomes, solve problems, lead people, or drive results?”
One of the more notable April trends was the continued cooling within white-collar hiring.
Professional and business services have slowed compared to previous years, and competition for hybrid and remote positions remains intense. Many employers are still hiring, but the process often includes:
This environment can significantly impact client confidence.
Many job seekers interpret slow responses or rejections as personal failure. In reality, many organizations are simply operating more cautiously than they did during the aggressive hiring years following the pandemic.
That distinction matters.
Career professionals are increasingly helping clients manage not only strategy, but mindset and resilience throughout a longer and more emotionally taxing process.
Despite the slowdown in some professional sectors, healthcare continues to show strong hiring momentum.
Importantly, this growth extends beyond clinical positions. Healthcare organizations continue hiring for:
This creates meaningful opportunities for career changers and candidates with transferable skills.
It also reinforces a larger trend: industries centered on people, service, and human interaction continue to demonstrate resilience even as automation and AI evolve.
The April market reinforces something many of us have been discussing for months:
Today’s job market rewards clarity, positioning, adaptability, and relationship-building.
Clients need more than keyword optimization alone. They need help understanding:
For résumé writers and career coaches, this is an opportunity to elevate our role from document creators to strategic advisors.
The professionals who will thrive in this market are not necessarily the loudest or the fastest applicants. They are the candidates who can clearly articulate how they solve problems, lead teams, improve outcomes, and contribute to business success.
And increasingly, our job is helping them learn how to tell that story effectively.
In the AI-driven world of job coaching, we key in on resumes, LinkedIn profiles / digital footprints, AI integration, networking, interviewing, and take-action strategies. We refine bullet points, optimize keywords, and help job seekers develop their stories and personal brand.
All good stuff.
But there is one powerful, often invisible force that quietly undermines all of this work, and it is rarely addressed: Shame. Embarrassment, humiliation, and disgrace all rolled into one.
When I was fired by a best friend a few decades ago, I not only lost my job, but my entire identity. I suddenly became a failure as a father, husband, and friend. I was suffering from deep-rooted shame.
And for many job seekers, especially those who have experienced job loss, career setbacks, long gaps, or unexpected transitions, shame is not just a reality… it’s pretty much all-consuming at the conscious and subconscious levels.
Shame shapes how job seekers see themselves, how they communicate, and ultimately, how engaged they are in the process. When coaches ignore shame, they wind up addressing only half of the employment problem.
This is because the best resumes in the world, created by the best resume pros, are no match against the destructive power of shame.
Shame is not the same as disappointment or frustration. It runs deeper. Shame says:
“JAY’S CREDENTIALS INCLUDE BEING FIRED BY ONE OF HIS BEST FRIENDS at age 39, having no clue what he wanted to do for a living, and having a 3-year old son who must have been asking… ‘How did I wind up with this clown for a father?’”
This is how many of my books begin and how my LinkedIn About section opens. How was I supposed to address a resume and job search process with a deep-rooted feeling of shame – a feeling of worthlessness?
A great number of job seekers tie their identity directly to their work. When that work disappears, whether through layoffs, burnout, demotion, whatever – it can feel like a loss of self, not just income and title. This is especially true for:
Resume writers and career coaches are trained and certified to focus on a plethora of traditional and emerging tactics and processes, not emotions. And given the tsunami of change triggered by AI in just resume writing, there is even more emphasis today being placed on…
All this matters !
But here’s the reality: A person who feels ashamed will struggle to advocate for themselves – no matter how strong their resume is or how strategically perfect the coaching is. Shame quietly and destructively obstructs the entire job search process.
When job seekers experience shame, their perspective of themselves becomes distorted. So for resume writers, a resume is more than a marketing/personal branding document. It’s an identity reminder. When job seekers feel humiliated and unsure of themselves, they struggle to regain their true identity. And if shame isn’t addressed at the outset, it creates a ripple effect…
On the contrary, addressing shame simply means becoming aware of its power, and supportive in how coaches guide job seekers. It starts with recognizing that behind every job search, is a human being navigating significant loss, fearful uncertainty, and/or sabotaging self-doubt to some degree.
Many clients feel isolated in their struggles. They assume they are the only ones feeling this way. Job coaches can help simply by acknowledging that 1) career setbacks are common, 2) job loss is not a personal failure, and 3) identity disruption is natural and yes, uncomfortable. When job seekers feel seen and understood by their coaches, their defensiveness lowers, and they become more engaged and open to guidance.
One of the most powerful shifts you can help facilitate is this: “What happened to you is not who you are.” Perhaps help the job seeker identify 6-8 successes they have had over their lives, outside of the workplace, that had a significant impact on them and/or others.
The objective is to encourage clients to distinguish between their roles in the workplace and life outside the workplace – seeking out specific successes and highlights that are often overlooked or taken for granted.
No, this does not eliminate the ‘job problem.’ But the focus shift to past life successes can dramatically change how job seekers perceive themselves. This leads to establishing a confident rapid employment mindset – attitude.
Shame distorts stories. A coach’s job is to help rebuild them – truthfully, but constructively. Instead of:
We might guide them toward:
The facts don’t change – but the framing does. And it’s not delusion. This is not about spin. It’s about perspective. This is not about trickery. It’s about substituting a limiting belief for an empowering one.
Shame thrives in ambiguity. It weakens when confronted with clear, genuine evidence. We can help job seekers, not only by identifying specific accomplishments, problems they solved, and value they created… but by providing proof – validation.
“You say that you improved efficiency that led to greater levels of customer service. Is there someone (maybe your boss) who can confirm this?” Coaches need to be persistent here, as many clients will initially resist or minimize both their contributions and validation of such.
“That’s right,” the job seeker responds, “My boss and his boss gave me great reviews each year until the downsizing. I forgot that!” A coach’s job is to gently but firmly bring forgotten (or overlooked) contributions to light.
A myriad of red flags (job gaps, long unemployment, firings, etc.) are major triggers for shame. Job seekers will then try to over-explain them (defensively), feel outwardly embarrassed when discussing them, or dismiss them hoping they’ll go somehow go away.
Resume pros and career coaches can help job seekers to first acknowledge that they face a challenge to be addressed, not a problem to be harped upon. Then provide simple, honest explanations (not excuses), and redirect the focus to their readiness and capabilities. In so many cases, confidence just in addressing red flags often matters more than the red flag itself.
Shame tends to keep people stuck in the past. Coaches and resume pros can help shift focus toward. What’s next? What’s possible? What opportunities exist? What can you control?
When employment professionals provide specific strategies and tools to help alter job seekers’ beliefs and perspectives about themselves… positive attitudes and high engagement follow. Extraordinary transformations occur.
When you address shame effectively, several things happen:
More importantly, you provide an invaluable service to job seekers they can’t get elsewhere:
This is not small thing.
* For those interested in addressing this topic within a PARWCC certification program, please check out CEMP. https://parwcc.com/certified-motivational-and-empowerment-professional-cemp/
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||