News from PARWCC!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thank you for joining us for our virtual THRIVE! 2026 conference! It was a pleasure having you with us, and we hope you enjoyed the sessions, conversations, and opportunities to connect and learn.
If you missed a session—or would simply like to revisit your favorite moments—recordings from the conference are available on your PARWCC Learning Center. You’ll have access to the recordings for the next 90 days, so there’s plenty of time to catch up and review the content at your convenience.
We’d also love to hear about your experience. Please take a few minutes to complete our survey. Your feedback is incredibly valuable and helps us continue improving our events and creating a better experience for all our members.
Thank you once again for being part of the conference and contributing to its success. We truly appreciate your participation and look forward to welcoming you to another event soon!
Warm regards,
The PARWCC Leadership Team
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At some point, we developed a societal impression that the way a clock moves is the natural way of doing things. Clockwise is the default pattern, it’s the order you take turns in a card game — it’s ubiquitous. The opposite direction doesn’t even have its own word; it’s just counterclockwise. It isn’t a different, equally viable option, but a deviation from the standard.
Coincidentally, counterclockwise is also the direction that my wife walks around the body of water near our home. For reasons beyond me, I take the path clockwise. I doubt there’s any rhyme or reason to it; most likely, the dog smelled something interesting in that direction the first time we went, and thus our routine was set.
Despite the randomness of that choice, I still couldn’t believe that my wife was walking the opposite direction. Didn’t she know that the angle of the sunrise was especially gorgeous when you follow the trail clockwise? I explained this and my other very compelling reasons to take the path the opposite direction, which earned me a laugh and an, “Okay, Mr. Rigid.”
I’ve been walking this path in the same direction for almost five years. I know where things are, and I know the familiar morning crowd. But when I took my wife’s approach and followed the trail counterclockwise, it all seemed so different.
I didn’t see people the same way simply because we were coming at each other from different positions. Where before I would have recognized them by their gait or their dog, they seemed like totally different entities as I passed them from the opposite direction. My apologies to those nice people to whom, in my ignorance of our previous association, I failed to give the standard polite nod of acknowledgment.
It wasn’t just the people, though. I discovered interesting architectural features of houses along the path, a brightly colored door or intricate detailing on columns. And the sunlight hit the water in the most gorgeous way that I hadn’t been able to appreciate on my usual route.
Was the walk markedly better because I took the counterclockwise path? Not really. It was beautiful, but I live in Florida, so that’s kind of the standard. I was there just as early, sweat just as much, and saw the same people.
Every inch of pavement was exactly the same, but my experience of it was novel. So I asked myself, where else am I taking the path clockwise simply because that’s how I’ve always done it? One area that I identified was the way that I digest information on the businesses that I manage or consult for.
I always hate the end of the month because I have entirely too much data coming my way. With all these facts and figures swarming around me, I simply can’t give it all the proper time that it demands when everything needs handling right this moment. And when I’m overwhelmed, I fall back on my routine. I know how each company presents their data, I know my processes for analysis, and I look at each company in an A, B, C, order. In other words, I take the path clockwise.
I try to finish things quickly so I can provide timely assistance and insights, but by the time I get to D, E, and F, those companies just aren’t getting the same attention that A and B receive. They’re no less important, but by that point, I’ve done so many laps on the path that I’m just not seeing them anymore. So this last month, I started at F and worked my way up the alphabet.
I didn’t have any huge epiphanies that would radically alter the path of these businesses. But I did find all kinds of actionable information that would have remained in the shadows if I’d approached them from my usual, clockwise perspective. To me, that’s a pretty successful experiment.
Maybe next month I’ll start with C and D and go a different direction. Even though the path is the same, changing my direction gives me a different perspective and a different energy that I can apply to it. And if all I get out of this approach is seeing things from a different angle, then I think the experience will have been well worth it.
In January, twenty-five coaches logged into my first live Certified Interview Coach (CIC LIVE) cohort with a real mix of backgrounds. Some had been coaching interview skills for years without a formal method behind it. Others were brand new to the specialty, including a retiring librarian ready to start a second career and a community college career counselor building on what she’d learned mostly from Google searches. What they had in common was a gap between what they were doing for clients and what they wanted to be able to do.
I measured that gap twice: once at intake, before the course started, and again at the end of the program. Both surveys asked coaches to rate their own confidence across the same twelve core skills, from designing a tailored interview prep plan to measuring their own coaching impact. All twenty-five participants completed both surveys, which gave me a clean before-and-after picture of the impact of six weeks of live instruction.

All 25 coaches reported an increase in their confidence with interview coaching skills, and every single one of the 12 competencies measured showed improvement. The average self-rated skill across all twelve areas moved from 2.66 to 4.36 on a five-point scale. That’s a substantial gain, and it held up consistently rather than being carried by a handful of outliers.
But the most interesting finding wasn’t the size of the overall increase. It was where the biggest changes occurred. Coaches came in least confident about handling newer challenges like AI and asynchronous interviews, unsure if they had the diagnostic judgment to assess interview performance, and uncertain about how to measure their own coaching effectiveness. The biggest gains showed up exactly where the biggest gaps were. Confidence in using tools to measure and improve coaching impact had the largest movement in the survey. Confidence in providing successful strategies for AI-assessed and asynchronous interviews nearly doubled. Confidence in their diagnostic ability to assess clients’ interview performances went from unsure (2.52 out of 5) to a near certainty (4.44 out of 5).
The fact that we saw some of the strongest increases in those areas tells me CIC LIVE isn’t simply reinforcing what experienced coaches already know. It’s helping coaches build current expertise in areas where the profession itself is changing. The competencies where coaches felt least equipped were exactly where the course closed the most ground.
Skills coaches already felt reasonably solid on, like coaching across different interview formats or helping clients navigate red flags such as terminations or resume gaps, still improved by more than a full point each. Nothing in the survey stayed flat.
CIC had previously been a self-study program, so one of the questions I had when I redesigned it as a live cohort was whether the live format would add meaningful value. Several coaches said the live format mattered as much as the content. What came through in their comments was that they valued the opportunity to practice interview coaching, not just learn about it.
“The live coursework made a significant difference, and the real-world perspective added meaningful depth to the experience.”
“Having a live group is great, being able to network and bounce ideas off each other was very helpful.”
The data around the breakout sessions was where I saw that most concretely. In breakout rooms, coaches had to execute or role play different interview coaching skills live, in front of peers. One breakout session asked coaches to help a client reframe a negative belief about a termination, another had them prepare and deliver feedback on a mock “Tell Me About Yourself” answer. The breakout sessions were rated “useful” or “very useful” by 88 to 96 percent of participants, with the strongest response going to the session on preparing mock interview questions and the session on building a full coaching curriculum for a client. Several coaches commented that they would like even more of that practice time in future cohorts.
Every single respondent, all twenty-five, agreed that the course improved their coaching skills, improved their confidence as a coach, and that they’d recommend it to a colleague. It was unanimous agreement across three separate outcome measures.
The open-ended comments explain why. The words that came up again and again were “tools”, “framework”, and “methodology”.
“I now have a clear framework and tools to offer my clients.”
“The tools and frameworks are immediately usable with clients and provide a clear methodology that goes well beyond typical interview preparation tactics.”
“Each session was meaningful and filled with practical tools that enhanced my confidence as a career coach”
“I wasn’t just learning concepts—I was building a repeatable coaching methodology.”
All 25 Coaches Unanimously Agreed

The cohort reported that practical results showed up fast. One coach said, “I am immediately bringing a ton of extra value to everyone who works with me and have already seen a huge uptick in client success.” Similar comments included:
“I left each session with clear takeaways I could immediately apply in my coaching work.”
“By the end of the second session, I was already incorporating what I learned into my coaching practice.”
“I learned skills and techniques that I could immediately incorporate into my interview skills coaching”
Although 80% of the coaches said they did not offer interview coaching as a separate service when they started the program, many described their confidence in offering it as an independent service after completing the course
“This course was what I needed to feel confident selling my coaching services.”
“I went from peeking at a brand-new career and wondering if I can even do that at my age, to feeling like I will be ready to be a coach and help people land their dream jobs.”
“(The CIC LIVE course) prepared me to provide interview coaching as a stand-alone service”.
A methodology they could use, results they could see with clients, and a service they felt ready to take to market: these were exactly the outcomes I designed CIC LIVE to deliver. I wanted coaches to leave with an adaptable, data-informed interview coaching methodology they could use intentionally with any client. I wanted them to feel confident in their interview knowledge, coaching expertise, diagnostic judgment, and ability to teach the communication skills that help clients win offers. The results from this first cohort tell me we’re doing exactly that.
The second CIC LIVE cohort just finished their program and is completing their certification exams now. If this data is any indication, they’re about to walk back into their practices with a level of confidence they didn’t have six weeks ago.
I can’t wait to see what story their numbers tell.
The third CIC LIVE cohort starts January 7th. Save your spot here: https://members.parwcc.com/store/viewproduct.aspx?id=27726141
I have been thinking lately about the difference between doing a job well and belonging to a profession. The distinction is probably less obvious than we sometimes make it sound. Plenty of people build successful businesses around a particular skill, develop real expertise, serve clients well, and earn a living without ever thinking much about what makes their work part of a larger profession. At some point, though, a field begins to ask questions that extend beyond the individual practitioner. What should someone doing this work actually know? What standards should exist? What responsibility comes with advising another person? How do we decide what competent work looks like when no licensing board or regulatory body makes that decision for us?
Resume writing and career coaching are interesting examples because the barriers to entry are so low. Someone can decide today that they are a resume writer or career coach and begin marketing those services tomorrow. There is no state license to obtain, no examination required before accepting a client, and no single authority determining whether someone has earned the right to use the title. In some ways, I think that openness has helped the profession. Many excellent writers and coaches came into this work through recruiting, human resources, education, leadership, communications, and other careers that gave them a perspective they may never have developed through one prescribed route. The other side of that openness, however, is that the profession has to take greater responsibility for establishing its own expectations.
That is one of the reasons I believe certification has value. The letters after our names are the most visible part of earning a credential, but I have never thought they were the most important part. What matters more is the process that comes before them. Certification asks us to compare our work with standards we did not create for ourselves. It asks us to study, submit our work for evaluation, and accept the possibility that something we have been doing for years may not be as strong as we believed it was. For people who spend much of their careers working independently, that outside evaluation can be particularly valuable because experience has a way of reinforcing both our strengths and our habits.
There is an understandable confidence that develops when you have done something successfully for a long time. You learn what works. You develop instincts. You begin recognizing patterns before a client finishes explaining the problem. All of that is part of becoming good at the work, but experience can also make it easier to stop questioning certain decisions. Certification introduces another set of eyes and another set of standards. It forces us to explain why we structure a resume a certain way, why we emphasize one accomplishment over another, or why we recommend a particular career strategy. There is a difference between knowing from experience that something tends to work and understanding the professional reasoning behind why it works.
I also think certification contributes to something larger than the development of any one writer or coach. Professions need some degree of shared language, common expectations, ethical standards, and continuing education if they are going to mature. That has become even more important as our work changes. Artificial intelligence is altering how resumes are written and how clients approach the process. Recruiting technology continues to evolve. Hiring practices shift, job categories change, and advice that may have made perfect sense several years ago can become outdated faster than we would like to admit. A certification earned at one point in a career cannot permanently establish expertise, nor should we expect it to. What it can do is reinforce the idea that professional competency is something we continue working on rather than something we complete.
None of this means that a credential guarantees excellent work. It does not. I have met extremely capable professionals who hold multiple certifications, and I have met extremely capable professionals who hold none. Credentials cannot replace judgment, curiosity, ethics, or the ability to understand the person sitting across from you. What certification does provide is a willingness to have our work measured against something other than our own opinion of it, and I think there is real value in that, particularly in a profession where clients often have very little way of evaluating our expertise before trusting us.
Perhaps that is part of what separates a service from a profession. It is not simply that people are willing to pay us to do the work. It is that, over time, the people doing the work decide it deserves standards, scrutiny, education, and a responsibility to keep getting better at it.
One constant question among my career coaching community and my Certified Professional Career Coaches is: How do I coach job seekers discouraged by the current job market?
We see job seekers who apply for hundreds of jobs online and maintain meticulous spreadsheets; however, they don’t build relationships, meet people in person, or follow up on applications or interactions. They feel dejected by a lack of response from online job searches.
If most job seekers are doing the same passive activity and it isn’t effective, something has to give.
The World Economic Forum estimates that more than 90% of employers use automated systems to screen job applicants. The question is, “What happens when the systems they use come from a limited set of vendors?”
According to the Stanford Digital Economy Lab (May 2026): Q&A | Algorithmic Monoculture in Hiring, “On the algorithmic side, our work finds that you need to apply to more jobs than ever before — and apply widely. Some employers use the same processes (sometimes literally the same vendor), so submitting more applications through identical pipelines won’t generate new evaluations. That’s part of why range matters. The flip side: as a job seeker, you’ll probably end up learning more about employers’ hiring stacks than researchers do, because you’ll be asked to complete the various steps of these processes yourself across many firms.”
Many job seekers who secured employment from 2020 to 2022 were mostly employed remotely. They worked from home, using a laptop and computer screen for Zoom/Teams meetings. That was the norm; they didn’t know any different. Many job seekers today are required to work from an office or hold a hybrid job (about 65% according to many polls and the BLS).
Many of these job seekers were told that earning a college degree could lead to a starting six-figure salary. This is not typically the case. Most entry-level positions begin at $40K annually; some medical positions begin at $65K and up (nursing), X-ray technicians ($48K and over $100K years later), electrician I ($50K), and lead master electrician ($75-95K), as examples (Salary.com). Location affects salary levels. Everyone must work their way up the salary ladder. There is certainly room to negotiate an initial salary. Nevertheless, new workers must prove their worth.
During that same timeframe, people who worked for employers that sent them home to work remotely during 2020 had to change their lives and work styles. It takes discipline to work from home after years in an office (it also takes space, equipment, and in some cases, quiet). People-persons lose social interaction and water-cooler conversations when they work from home. It can become lonely.
In 2025-2026, the federal government retired or laid off 12% of its workforce, or about 256K personnel. Nearly all government employees were required to work remotely beginning in 2020, and nearly all government employees were required to return to office work in 2025. A major switch.
Today, more than 8,000 jobs are available to the public on usajobs.gov. There are 54 internship positions available.
Looking at specific federal agencies, for example, NASA will hire approximately 4,000+ interns (students enrolled in college programs) (280,000 applied in the 2022/2023 iteration – so the competition is tough – and most of the positions are onsite) through its pathways program (Spring 2027: Sep 14, 2026 · Summer 2027: Feb 26, 2027 · Fall 2027: May 21, 2027; 2028 deadlines are expected to follow the same pattern). https://www.nasa.gov/careers/pathways/.
I appreciate the skill sets they expect from the candidates: Prior experience is not required! They are looking for 7 non-technical competencies: Attention to Detail, Flexibility, Interpersonal Skills, Learning, Problem Solving, Self-Management (Achievement), and Technology Application. Job seekers can build these basic competencies through college team projects, retail or food service work, volunteering in the local community, holding banking teller positions during college, and serving on school committees or sports programs. If students demonstrate these skills in college or even high school on a resume, they may earn strong referral letters and references. These opportunities provide demonstrable and concrete examples of work experience, paid or unpaid.
In the medical field, the fastest-growing role is Nurse Practitioner, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (it requires a degree). The role is expected to grow 41% by 2035, creating 138,000 new jobs with a median pay of $132K annually. Also, Medical Assistant roles will continue to grow, as will Home Health/Personal Care Aide roles (requiring training and certifications).
If a job seeker is looking for an opportunity and a change in job duties that, in some cases, do not require a degree, opportunities are available.
By looking for companies hiring hundreds or thousands of new employees, job seekers and their career coaches can identify hiring trends and industries that are hiring. The medical profession will likely remain a steady hiring hub for years to come. Some hospitals and clinics are now hiring newly graduated nurses and training them, rather than hiring nurses with xx years of experience. Some markets are seeing a mindset shift in how they hire employees (e.g., with experience, or taking the risk of training new employees to build them up in the company).
https://stemgateway.nasa.gov/public/s/explore-opportunities.
There are many more resources available online for job search and career management – these are just a few to help with research.
If there is one thing I have learned about this profession, it is this: We never sit still.
Fundamentals Director John Suarez has been sharing his thoughts about the evolution of your profession in his recent Insights meetings. The job market changes. Technology changes. Client expectations change. And just when we think we have figured something out, somebody invents a new acronym!
Which is exactly why I am so excited about what is happening at PARWCC – and especially about our upcoming Thrive! 2026 Virtual Conference.
Thrive: Because it’s important we rise and THRIVE!
Thrive isn’t intended to be another conference where you sit in front of your computer, listen to a speaker for an hour, download a handout and then promptly forget where you saved it.
We’ve all done that.
Instead, even though Thrive is virtual, we want this to be an opportunity to learn, connect, hopefully enjoy some laughs, and leave with something useful, no matter what YOUR practice looks like.
But there’s another reason I’m excited about Thrive. Our people.
One of the best things about PARWCC has always been the people who make up this organization. We have an incredible range of experience, specialties, backgrounds and perspectives represented in our membership.
And sometimes the person who can help you solve a problem isn’t the person standing at the front of the virtual room.
It’s the person sitting in the virtual room with you.
That’s the magic of an association. There’s still time to register!
We have a lot happening at PARWCC beyond Thrive.
Our programming continues to evolve around the three areas at the heart of our new Institute model: Interviewing, Coaching, and Writing.
We’re also expanding opportunities to explore digital career strategy, coaching, interviewing, technology, business development and the many other issues affecting career professionals today.
We’re looking at what our members need now – and maybe even tomorrow – not what they needed five years ago.
Because let’s be honest: five years ago, none of us had quite the same conversations about AI that we’re having today!
It isn’t the time to wring our hands and proclaim the sky is falling. It’s time to do what you’ve always done – learn about the trends, determine what your practice needs, and magnify your value as a human with expertise, skill and importantly . . . judgement.
This is where I am going to put on my Executive Director hat for just a minute. I’m a consumer too! My Mom was raised during the Depression and I had a lot of lessons about “value” as I was growing up and some of those I bring with me to PARWCC.
Are you using your PARWCC membership resources?
Because you have access to a lot more than a credential and a nice logo!
Go check the calendar and see if you want to register for upcoming live events. Live events don’t work for you? Check the Video Library.
IMPORTANTLY – have you updated your member profile? Your profile can be an important way for potential clients to learn more about you and your business. Job seekers want to affirm a real person is the right person to work with as they navigate a complicated job search. Make it easier for them to find you!
Have you attended an Insights meeting?
Have you connected with another member?
Have you taken advantage of one of our educational programs?
And, most importantly, have you registered for Thrive?
If the answer to some of those questions is, “Um…no?”
I get it. You’re busy – no one in this industry isn’t hustling to help clients and improve your practice. But it’s worth it to go poke around parwcc.com. Your membership is an investment. I want you to use it.
Running a career services business can be wonderfully rewarding.
It can also be isolating.
Many of us work independently – even if you are part of a team. And sometimes we need someone who understands exactly what we’re talking about when we say, “My client wants to put 47 skills on the first page of the résumé.”
That’s where community matters.
PARWCC gives you a place to find people who understand the work—not just the résumé, not just the coaching, not just the interview, but the profession that is behind it all. That is what I want PARWCC to continue to be: a place where you can learn something new, find your people, get a little inspiration, and occasionally say, “Oh good. It’s not just me!”
Join us for the conference. Take a look at the programming coming up. Explore the resources that are already part of your membership.
And if you haven’t been taking full advantage of PARWCC, there’s no better time to start.
And I promise—we’re not going to make you memorize another acronym.
At least not this month.
See you at Thrive!
Margaret
Executive Director
PARWCC
“Deliver what you promise. Do not fabricate or conceal facts. Coach clients to present accurate, evidence-based achievements and explain risks of mis-representation.”
— PARWCC Code of Business Ethics
“About 93% of job seekers admit to embellishing or lying during the hiring process.”
– Forbes, April 2026
There are lies.
Then, there are “white lies.”
Then, there are résumés.
I suspect you associate that cynical philosophy with uninformed job seekers or jaded hiring decision makers. However, I’ve seen the meaning of these words offered—and accepted—as good advice between professional résumé writers and career coaches.
This article will explain how that situation could occur, where you will find evidence of its existence, who’s responsible when it does happen, and how to guard your own practice from its toxic influences.
Some professionals slide into this transgression for the very best of reasons: they are doing all they can to “help” their clients. Paradoxically, it’s our drive to produce the best possible résumé, cover letter, and LinkedIn profile to give our clients the best possible advantage in the interviews which lead us astray. The greater the challenges our clients bring us, the more we want to help. Perhaps a real life example will illustrate the potential pitfall.
A client seeks out a résumé writer. He says he had a continuous work history for a considerable time before he came into a large inheritance. He used that money to travel the world. But now it’s time to return to the workforce. The writer knows, and his client may suspect, that such a long break in employment may be a “red flag” to an employer.
At this critical point, the writer may get too close to the guardrail. They should be thinking about which skills the client had demonstrated that could be useful in another career field or with another company. Instead, this question creeps to the fore: How can I “spin” this break in employment? And, seeking to reach out to the client, he begins to discuss this idea with her. And the client is impressed.
However, the thoughtful client will be impressed in the wrong way. She’s put off by the idea that she has to “sell herself,” that résumés are documents that stretch the truth. Beyond that, such a résumé sets her up to continue the deception in the interviews. No wonder she’s upset; the entire process is demeaning. And now the writer has just confirmed those repugnant thoughts. The relationship the writer wants to have with this client is undermined. And so is the client’s view of the writer and our entire industry.
That view—that résumés and people who write them—are somehow dishonest goes back a long way. Decades ago, the primary source of advertising, The Yellow Pages, placed résumé writers in the same category as “massage parlors” and “escort services.” Back then, they considered them “rackets” and wouldn’t accept ads for them, even if those high standards cost them profitable customers. Thanks to PARWCC’s efforts our industry is now accepted as fully professional. We want to do everything we can to continue that perception.
Keeping high standards starts with us. Specifically, it begins when we qualify potential clients. Each of us should be able to answer this question: “Which clients will we not accept because we know we cannot help them?” Set aside the obvious answers for the moment: We might not be able to help a person with a very specialized background about which we know too little. We might not be able to meet a client’s very tight deadline. So how do we proceed? We often refer such clients to colleagues who have the background or resources we lack.
To return to the issue at hand, let’s think a bit deeper. Perhaps the following questions should guide us: Does this person have unrealistic expectations? Has this job seeker been slacking off for years and so has no performance that would meet an employer’s needs? Does he or she lack the minimum qualifications for the job? You may want to offer some general advice (without charge) just so this applicant hasn’t been left completely empty handed. But these are not—and never can be—a professional résumé writer’s clients.
One category remains: the special circumstances client. Consider the example I wrote about above, someone with several years’ break in employment. In cases like this, honesty (never “spin”) is the only policy. You are a talented enough writer to anticipate this concern in the cover letter. Perhaps these thoughts would be useful (if it reflects the truth as to what the client has been doing during his break):
“My résumé shows some time away from the work-a-day world. That period allowed me to reflect upon my own professional development. Now that I’ve had time to polish my skills dealing with other cultures and reflecting on which contributions I could make that would be most valuable to companies like yours, I am refreshed and ready to put all my energy and talent at your disposal.”
Honesty is the underlying value here. From a purely practical standpoint, it’s the only policy that makes sense. The alternative requires you and your client to lie…and to remember which story you told to which person. Just because the past cannot be changed, doesn’t limit the future for you or your clients.
I want to close by offering some concrete suggestions to keep us all on the straight and narrow (and profitable) path. Please consider these criteria for your clients to use as they judge the résumés and cover letters you write. First, did you (inadvertently) give them too little or too much credit for their accomplishments? Second, did they think of another example that illustrates the transferable skills that appeal to employers? Third, does your choice of words, your portrayal of their philosophy (particularly in the cover letter), “sound” like them?
We sell our clients confidence to manage their careers. We do it well by working very hard to build and maintain their trust, one client, one referral, at a time. So, let us rededicate ourselves to that mission and our code of ethics by instinctively knowing what really helps our clients, our practices, and our industry.
Multiple sources have reported that the Tenshoku Sodan Bar in Yokohama, Japan offers free drinks and “job-changing consultation” by reservation only to anyone who questions whether it’s time to make a new career move.
“Instead of bartenders mixing cocktails and making small talk, guests sit down one-on-one with trained career counselors from LIA, a Japanese staffing service.”
“Sessions take place in private rooms to keep conversations confidential. Most last between 60 and 90 minutes, though there’s no strict time limit. Guests can choose from alcoholic or non-alcoholic drinks while they talk — all of it free of charge.”
Here are 9 reasons why that idea would never work in the US:
By year two, it would just be another loud bar where somebody insists they’re “between opportunities” while wearing an expensive watch and ordering a dry martini. But if you’re thinking about it, here are some name possibilities:
Possible slogan: see the title of this article.
Signature drink: The Resignation Letter, served in a heavy rocks glass with dramatically singed rosemary because subtlety quit two jobs ago. Ingredients: bourbon, espresso liqueur, black walnut bitters, and smoked orange peel. The menu description would read: “Bold upfront. Bitter finish. Notes of burnout and ignored calendar invites.”
So much low-lying fruit; not enough time.
You can read the original article here.
After 35+ years writing for PARW and PARWCC’s Spotlight (since 1990), I will conclude my contributions at the end of 2026. This is the first of three departing articles.
I don’t believe our profession is ending. Yes, I believe the profession I entered 35 years ago has pretty much ended. But a much more important profession is emerging.
And I don’t say that with any sense of disappointment. I say it with excitement and fascination because I believe the entire employment space (resume writers, career coaches, HR pros, recruiters, etc.) is at a place in its evolution where it must totally reinvent itself – again. As it did in the early 1990s.
And here’s why.
We helped people write better resumes that instilled a higher degree of confidence and success. We taught them how to be more comfortable and poised during interviews. We helped them create job search strategies and tactical methods to change careers, options to climb the success ladder, and effective ways to tell their professional stories.
And as we evolved over the past 35+ years, we really did become very good at those things.
However… something beyond extraordinary is happening
Without question, Siri, Claude, Gemini, Alexa – Artificial intelligence – can now do much of the work we once considered ‘our professional specialties.’ And it does it consistently. And it improves regularly. And it does so to an infinite scale. For example, I can ‘perhaps’ work competently with 10-15 people at a time – providing personal and customized attention. AI can work with millions – perhaps an infinite – number of people personally with quality customized attention. For free, or at most, $20 a month (what I pay for unlimited Chat GPT).
Books that took me six months to write and another four months for McGraw-Hill to publish… AI can do in eight minutes (or less). AI can write a resume, evaluate and rewrite a LinkedIn profile, analyze job descriptions, identify keywords and skills, generate interview questions, evaluate facial and bodily responses to interview questions, suggest career options, and assist job seekers acknowledge and articulate past accomplishments. And here’s the thing:
Yes, there are many critical discussion points that need to be debated. But I believe the following question is the most important question that needs to be addressed:
What happens when AI becomes very good at the things that clients historically paid us to do?
My answer to this is simple: We move up the value chain !
For decades, we have largely helped people present themselves for work. The emerging opportunity is to help people design their work life in a transformational AI world… “to enrich their whole life!”
And I would suggest that this is a much bigger responsibility… and a much bigger opportunity. Think about the difference.
AI can now handle this effectively !
We move up the value chain by transitioning into workplace strategists and architects
A workplace strategist (architect) asks:
That is where I believe our profession is headed. Let AI do its thing – knowing job seekers need invaluable human input.
The evolution of the career/employment space will transition from the traditional services to helping people:
Now here’s the thing… Chat GPT can now help people explore the above questions. And in many cases, it can even provide surprisingly good information, analysis and possibilities.
This, I believe, is where the future lies. And it means you should stop thinking of AI primarily as your competitor. You should think of it as your most powerful new administrative assistant.
Let AI do more of the research. Let it analyze more information, produce first drafts, and even generate ‘possibilities.’ And let it handle most of the repetitive work we’ve been doing for decades.
Then you can spend more time doing the things that matter most:
Without question, significant new subjects, methods, tools, beliefs, systems, processes, and certifications need to be studied. Then they need to be turned into effective, engaging services indispensable to those they serve.
Stop thinking of new ways to write resumes. AI is doing that. Stop thinking about how to get people to network better. AI is doing that.
What AI is NOT doing is customizing what AI is producing – and providing individualized attention to what I noted above: Thinking. Questioning. Interpreting. Strategizing. Challenging and Encouraging. Decision Making. Life – Workplace Balance.
This requires retraining. FAST! Perhaps the greatest mistake you could make is to spend the next several years defending the job description you had in the past. The opportunity is to create the job description you will need in the future.
And this requires vision and an openness to change.
Something larger
Workplace strategists and architects won’t simply help people get their next job – but will challenge them to understand where they are going, why they are going there, what they need, whom they themselves need to become to get there, and how to continually adapt once they arrive. Oh, and to enjoy the journey in pursuit of the goal – regardless of stress, anxiety, and fear !
After 35 years, I don’t see a profession disappearing. I see a profession in total transition. At warp speed. Resume writing and career coaching will become pretty much insignificant as AI takes over. But the career conversation will not. The “how do I secure the right workplace opportunity to live a fulfilling life” will not. The human factor will not.
Ask better questions – get better answers
The question isn’t: “Will AI replace resume writers and career coaches?”
A question is: “What can resume writers and career coaches become now that AI can do much of what they used to do?”
A cliché is something that’s said so much, over time it’s lost its meaning. That said, the starting point will be revisiting our industry’s two most famous questions… that we tend to pay little attention to:
Workplace strategists and architects will be focusing on #2.
That’s how they’ll move up the value chain.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||